#140

Ageing might very well be a bacterial infection, so you might have inadvertently told the truth :joy:

7 Likes
#141

I’m lucky in that the antibiotics are available OTC here and are cheap, to boot.
So, if I can’t find any compelling reason not to, I’ll also be doing the “5 week trial”.

3 Likes
#142

This is very interesting.

I wonder how often such a “cleanse” should be administered? One-time? Yearly? A longer frequency?

From what I am reading here, they achieved a lot with just one round of treatment, right?

3 Likes
#143

Forgive my ignorance, but I’m not sure I understand why many of you want to do this protocol. Is it just in case you have cancer stem cells, then this is a way to nip them in the bud, so to speak? I suppose that may be reason enough, but I had to ask. Also, when the author speaks of 1uM/L, how is that measured using, say, a scale that can measure .001 gram, = or -? Is this protocol the same as eradicated senescent cells, or is that something different? He also discusses using azithromycin by itself to eradicate senescent cells. What dosage of azithromycin does he suggest for that? For how long? Thanks.

#144

FWIW

Review in detail the patent application.

#145
3 Likes
#146

For those of you who plan to do this protocol, is it because you see it as a way to clear out senescent cells? Presumably none of you think you have the specific type of cancer that the author focuses on with this protocol. OR is your thinking ‘just in case’ you have that type of cancer?

#147

FWIW

There are 50/fifty claims in the patent application.

1 Like
#148

What is there to pull off?

It is a very simple procedure, cost very little with a potential of much larger benefits.

As I have stated this is a no brainier.

In my view this is even less risk than taking rapamycin.

4 Likes
#149

I should say:

If you guys notice any improvement like that 77-year-old man.

I sincerely hope you do as it sounds like a highly innocuous yet effective therapy. I don’t see any downside here except wasted time and effort.

I would love a beneficial therapy to be this easy. It sounds too good to be true. I am eagerly waiting to hear back about this group’s progress.

4 Likes
#150

Usually is my friend, but maybe we will win the lottery.

4 Likes
#151

I am rooting for all of you!

Go Team Longevity! :slight_smile:

3 Likes
#152

If this treatment removes cancer stem cells will it not also remove other types of stem cells? And, is that a potential problem? Outside of those possibilities I’m onboard with this.

1 Like
#153

Taking doxycycline and azithromycin for life extension makes no sense to me. One of my primary areas of focus for healthy longevity is maintaining a healthy Microbiome. And abiotic drastically disruption in Microbiome, GI inflammation, intestine, permeability, and LPS leakage. All of these contribute to chronic information, which accelerate, biological agent. No thanks to antibiotics for me… I am the Microbiome guy.

Here is a link For a FREE copy of a booklet I wrote titled Dr. Ohhira’s Probiotics & Postbiotic Metabolites: Probiotics & Postbiotic Metabolites | Ross Pelton | The Natural Pharmacist

5 Likes
#154

It makes even less sense if there isn’t a lifespan study in for example mice, like how there is for rapamycin or acarbose. That’s the minimum level of evidence I consider.

5 Likes
#155
2 Likes
#156

I’ll curiously watch what happens to you lab rats, although I don’t think you’re going to notice much of anything. Hopefully no bad side effects. Don’t know how you will know if it “worked”.

1 Like
#157

Yes this is most likely going to have zero effect.

#158

And you base you assumption on what?

1 Like
#160

Just as us who take rapamycin do not know if rapamycin “works” in humans to extent human lifespan.

For myself, I read, review speak to a few people
and use critical thinking to make my own decisions.

:“When writing the story of your life, do not let anyone else hold the pen”

~Jack Kerouac

1 Like