Thanks @JuanDaw very much appreciate your analysis

1 Like

The impact of Niacin on Lp(a) might also differ depending on what type of apolipoprotein phenotype a person has and/or LPA genetics:

  1. This might help stratify the risk/reward decision for someone with high Lp(a) further.

  2. we recommend genetic testing for patients with elevated Lp(a) and to consider Niacin therapy in a patient-to-patient case based on genetic profile

Lowering of lipoprotein(a) level under niacin treatment is dependent on apolipoprotein(a) phenotype

Abstract

Background

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a cardiovascular risk factor; in addition to being a low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle, it contains highly heterogeneous apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. No prior studies have evaluated extended-release (ER) niacin effect on Lp(a) level depending on apo(a) phenotype.

Methods

For this 24-week, prospective, open-label clinical trial we recruited 30 men (mean age 46.2 ± 7.5 years) with Lp(a) levels >20 mg/dL. No participant had previously received lipid lowering therapy, and started ER niacin 500 mg with stepwise dose increasing up to 1.5–2.0 g. Subjects were evaluated for Lp(a), lipids, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), and fibrinolytic markers (plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, tissue plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 complex, plasmin–antiplasmin complex). Patients were divided into two groups with major low- (LMW) or high-molecular weight (HMW) apo(a) isoforms determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of plasma under reducing conditions followed by immunoblotting.

Results

At baseline, groups were comparable in age, lipid, inflammatory and fibrinolytic biomarkers levels. There was a significant difference in baseline Lp(a) concentrations: 92 ± 29 mg/dL versus 54 ± 46 mg/dL in LMW and HMW apo(a) groups, respectively, p < 0.01. During the course of niacin treatment Lp(a) decreased by 28% (p < 0.003), Lp-PLA2 by 22% (p < 0.001), C-reactive protein by 24% (p = 0.07)*** in LMW apo(a) group***, whereas no changes in Lp(a) and biomarkers levels were obtained in HMW apo(a) group.

Conclusion

High-dose ER niacin declines elevated Lp(a) level in male subjects with low- but not high-molecular weight apo(a) phenotype.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1567568815000094#:~:text=Niacin%20is%20effective%20not%20only,7]%2C%20[8].

Niacin decreases Lpa(a) by 20%. However, there has been cases reported in the literature with 60-80% reduction in Lp(a) levels by Niacin alone based on Lp(a) isoform. The following case presents a patient with reduction of Lp(a) levels by 68% with Niacin.

62-year-old male with past medical history of CAD with elevated calcium score 254 and elevated Lp(a). Patient presented to the cardiologist office to establish care and at that time Lp(a) was 325.7 nmol/L not on any lipid reducing agents. Patient was started on high dose Rosuvastatin and 6 months later, repeat Lp(a) level was persistently high 313 nmol/L (3.9% reduction). Patient was started on Niacin 500 mg daily and 5 months later Lp(a) levels significantly reduced to 115 nmol/L (63% reduction).

Recent studies have shown that reduction of Lp(a) by Niacin could be related to Apolipoprotein(a) isoform size, which normally confers rate of Lp(a) anabolism and catabolism as well as structural and functional properties of Lp(a). However, apart from apo(a) isoform size, Niacin also binds to the LPA gene promoter region. Our patient underwent genetic testing, he had rs3798220 variant in LPA gene.Research has shown that the presence of such sequence variants near the promoter region, can affect niacin regulation and furthermore can explain the difference of Niacin effectivity among patients.
Conclusion

Based on these findings, we recommend genetic testing for patients with elevated Lp(a) and to consider Niacin therapy in a patient-to-patient case based on genetic profile.

https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/S0735-1097(23)03757-9

3 Likes

$40/ 30 pills. Has to come from Poland? Wonder if they’ll ship to US.

I’ve been worried about megadosing the Niacin, cut back to 250 morning and night a few months ago. Now pretty much counting on the magic crystals (if cyclodextrins are actually crystals) Lol.

Guns, Bible, and Magic crystals.

Seems it is a Polish startup and they have patented it if I understood correctly some articles I skimmed.

1 Like

Perspective on how the potential cautions for the paper might (or might not) matter (from the context of people taking NAD or NAD precursors):



3 Likes

So Dr Sinclair and the paper above* in the context of Niacin have now pointed us to two different genetic variants that we might want to weigh in context of Niacin and/or NAD precursor supplementation.

Does anyone know how to easily check our status of those two?

2 Likes

Another perspective for those trying to understand this stuff

NMN Probably Won't Make You Live Forever?

1 Like

NMN has some specific uses, but is not beneficial for all. Based on my research the following people may find NMN useful:

  1. Overweight
  2. Sleep deprived
  3. Jet lagged

So, IMHO, most people here should not be taking NMN. Unfortunately I am all 3 above, so I’m in the sweet spot. :stuck_out_tongue:

3 Likes

Interesting. NAD+ also seems like a good thing to test and then make decisions depending on where one’s levels are in relation to one’s age group and overall percentile.

Establishment medicine has been anti niacin for decades. Same old message.

2 Likes

Just a thought that occurred to me, but could it be that Niacin’s beneficial effects on lipoproteins is countered by its detrimental breakdown products (2PY & 4PY) and that’s why you see no overall effect on cardiovascular events and deaths ?

Also interestingly, in humans 2PY (and I’m assuming the same is true for 4PY) increases with age 2.6 fold

Blockquote

The mean plasma 2PY concentration in young (5-16 years old) healthy subjects was 0.39 +/- 0.22 micromol/l while in old healthy subjects (50-90 years old) it was approximately 2.6-fold higher. No gender differences was found in plasma 2PY concentration.

Blockquote

1 Like

As an aside, Niacin was tested by @ConquerAging and it provided the worst epigenetic age tests he has had this year by a longshot. So, Niacin doesn’t seem all that it’s cracked up to be for longevity.

Use Bempedoic Acid, Ezetemibe or a statin instead.

5 Likes

Hey @ConquerAging , what do you think of this product?

1 Like

This was true for higher dose niacin (500mg?) as I recall. He has since decreased the dosage (50mg?) to still get a NAD boost. Did I recall correctly?

3 Likes

As mentioned - I 100% agree with you on this for Apo B optimization (and don’t think there has been hardly any disagreement about that on this thread).

But @DeStrider - how do we use those medicines instead for Lp(a)? What to do in the context of high Lp(a) is or at least was the genesis/purpose of this thread.

2 Likes

Indeed Neo, thanks for keeping the discussion focused on my initial question. The focus is not on LDL or APOB but rather the focus is on Niacin or alternatives for Lp(a).

3 Likes

If you use Niacin to treat Lp(A), you may be affecting your epigenetic age. Unfortunately I am not aware of anything currently available to treat Lp(A). There are a few therapies under development and may be ready in a few years time.

1 Like

image

image

image

image

4 Likes

He might be talking about average lowering here

not the ~50% lower that was in the case of our forum member colleague that started this thread

Importantly note that PCSK9i impacting Lp(a) seems to occur at lower lowering levels.

What are your thoughts on this last piece?

2 Likes

Based on reading Sam Tsimikas page, I would use niacin to reduce my Lp(a), but I would check later whether the failed niacin trials didn’t find a stat sig effect (possibly because underpowered), or if it was a stat sig effect but no decrease. If experts disagree I’d look at the expert with possibly more knowledge about the topic, which is Sam in this case, if I didn’t know anything.

Since my Lp(a) was tested below 10 nmol/L I am not going to use niacin however to increase my HDL.

I didn’t know X was this useful to find information.

1 Like