Focusing more on Mitoglitazone, from this thread: New ITP result: Extension of lifespan by epicatechin, halofuginone and mitoglitazone in male but not female mice

The human clinical data on this drug:

Here’s everything publicly available (to my knowledge) on mitoglitazone (MSDC-0160) in humans—organized by indication and trial phase, with design, dose, outcomes, and safety.


Trials in people

Type 2 diabetes (T2D)

Phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, 12 weeks (n=258)
Arms: mitoglitazone 50, 100, or 150 mg QD; pioglitazone 45 mg QD (active comparator); placebo.
Primary/Key outcomes: fasting glucose, HbA1c, safety markers (hematocrit/hemoglobin as fluid-retention proxy), adiponectin, body weight/waist, lipoprotein particle size.
Findings:

  • The two active drugs (MSDC-0160 and pioglitazone) lowered fasting glucose to a similar extent.
  • HbA1c reductions with MSDC-0160 (100 & 150 mg) were not different from pioglitazone at 12 weeks.
  • Less fluid retention with MSDC-0160 (≈50% less reduction in hematocrit/hemoglobin vs pioglitazone).
  • Smaller rise in HMW adiponectin than pioglitazone (interpreted by authors as less adipose expansion).
  • Weight/waist changes trended smaller with MSDC-0160 vs pioglitazone over 12 weeks.
    Safety/tolerability: acceptable over 12 weeks; edema/volume-expansion signals were lower than with pioglitazone. (考研)

Notes: The publication includes PK run-in in healthy volunteers (once-daily for 7 days) used for dose selection; exposures at 50–150 mg are shown and supported the Phase IIb dosing. (考研)


Alzheimer’s disease (AD), non-diabetic participants

Phase IIa-style exploratory RCT, 12 weeks (MSDC-0160 150 mg QD)
Design: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled; n=29 (MSDC-0160 = 16; placebo = 13).
Primary readouts: FDG-PET brain glucose metabolism in predefined AD-vulnerable regions; cognitive/safety secondary.
Findings:

  • No significant between-arm difference in predefined regions when referenced to pons or whole brain.
  • With cerebellum as reference, MSDC-0160 maintained glucose metabolism over 12 weeks, while placebo declined in anterior/posterior cingulate, parietal, lateral temporal, and medial temporal cortices (exploratory).
  • Voxel-based analyses suggested additional FDG-PET differences consistent with central effects.
    Safety: generally well tolerated over 12 weeks. (PMC)

Registered trial record (same study): 3-month MSDC-0160 150 mg vs placebo with FDG-PET and cognition. (ClinicalTrials)


Other human-facing records

  • T2D Phase IIb registration (matching the 12-week RCT above) appears on trial registries/aggregators under NCT01103414, describing “Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Three Dose Levels of Mitoglitazone (MSDC-0160).” (ClinicalTrials)
  • Company and foundation pages summarize the above AD study and state that MSDC-0160 completed PoC in T2D and was advanced for neurodegenerative indications. (Good for context; not primary data.) (Metabolic Solutions Development Company)

What these human data say (bottom line)

  • Glucose-lowering efficacy: In T2D, mitoglitazone produced HbA1c and fasting glucose improvements comparable to pioglitazone over 12 weeks, with less fluid-retention signal—consistent with its design as a “PPAR-sparing” insulin sensitizer that modulates the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier (MPC/mTOT) rather than PPAR-γ. (考研)
  • Neurodegeneration signal: In mild AD (non-diabetic), an exploratory 12-week RCT showed FDG-PET preservation in some analyses (cerebellar reference; voxelwise) but no confirmatory primary-region difference using pons/whole-brain references. Safety was acceptable over 3 months. Larger, longer trials would be needed to judge clinical benefit. (PMC)

Mechanism notes relevant to translation

Structural/biophysical work since 2024–2025 confirmed that mitoglitazone directly binds and inhibits the human MPC complex, aligning with the clinical “PPAR-sparing insulin sensitizer” profile observed in the T2D RCT. (This is mechanistic context rather than clinical data.) (Science)


4 Likes

More on the commercial history of this drug:

Here’s what I found out about the commercial history of Mitoglitazone (MSDC-0160), especially around patents, approval status, and whether it’s ever been sold to consumers. There’s no evidence it was ever commercially marketed; it remains an investigational compound. Below are details, and what gaps remain.


Key Facts & Origins

  • Developer / Originator: Mitoglitazone (aka MSDC-0160, C-0160) was developed by Metabolic Solutions Development Company (often abbreviated MSDC). (Synapse)
  • Mechanism / Class: It is a thiazolidinedione analogue, functioning as an insulin sensitizer. Unlike classic TZDs, it is meant to spare PPAR-γ activation to avoid associated side effects, acting instead via modulation of mitochondrial targets (mTOT / mitochondrial pyruvate carrier). (IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology)

Patent-and-Synthesis / Early Chemistry

  • The chemical synthesis was described as early as in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1996, including references to PNU-91325—an earlier designation. (New Drug Approvals)
  • A specific patent is US 5,441,971, which covers certain thiazolidinedione analogs and related compounds (that may include precursors / metabolites / analogues relevant to Mitoglitazone). (New Drug Approvals)
  • Also, there is a patent for different polymorphs of Mitoglitazone (WO2011017244A1) published in 2011, covering crystal forms and formulation processes. (Google Patents)

Clinical Development / Regulatory & Commercial Status

  • Clinical trial status: Mitoglitazone has progressed through Phase II trials in Type 2 diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease. (adisinsight.springer.com)
  • Regulatory approvals: There is no record of Mitoglitazone having been approved by regulatory authorities (e.g. FDA, EMA) for any indication. It remains investigational. I found no evidence of submission of a New Drug Application (NDA) or Marketing Authorization Application (MAA), nor any approval label. (Synapse)
  • Commercial sale: Because it has never been approved, it has not been sold to consumers as an approved medicine. It is used only in clinical trials and research contexts. No brand name launch is documented. (Synapse)

Patenting Timeline & Status

What is known / what is missing:

Milestone Known Date / Detail Comment
Synthesis publication 1996 (Journal Med. Chem.) for certain analogues / the chemistry leading to Mitoglitazone (or its precursors) is described. (New Drug Approvals) This suggests the compound (or close analogs) was known in literature by mid-1990s.
Patents US5,441,971 and later patents (e.g. polymorph WO2011017244A1) exist. (Google Patents) These ensure protection of the molecule and formulation.
Phase II Clinical Development T2D trials around 2010-2011 (Phase IIb), Alzheimer’s trials started ~2011. (Synapse) Active research period was last ~2011–2014 for major trials.

Why It Wasn’t Commercialized

While definitive public statements are limited, from the data one can infer:

  • No regulatory approval → Without successful outcomes or sufficiently favorable risk/benefit, the developers did not move toward commercialization.
  • Phase II only → It never proceeded to Phase III trials, which are typically required for regulatory submissions and full approvals. (Synapse)
  • Discontinued status: Clinical development for T2D was discontinued. Alzheimer’s was explored but it seems not advanced to market. (NCATS Inxight Drugs)

Summary

  • Patented: yes; medicinal chemistry published 1996; patents for composition/formulation and polymorphs later (e.g. 2011).
  • Clinical testing: Phase II in T2D (~2010-2013), Alzheimer’s (~2011-2014) etc.
  • Approval & sales: never approved, never sold as a commercial drug to patients outside trials.
  • Current status: development appears to be inactive / paused. It remains an investigational compound.

3 Likes

Do we think the benefits are purely from reducing insulin?

What I wonder is whether there is a compelling reason for any of us to choose this class of drugs before a SGLT2, Acarbose, or/and a GLPA1.

So far, the canagliflozin study had the best outcome with 17% lifespan improvement.

1 Like