#61

They have a forum for the Rejuvenation Olympics .

Nothing like this amazing source of information.

20230305_143142
20230305_1431421920×1074 93.7 KB

1 Like
#62

Trudiagnostic says weather has delayed play.

1 Like
#63

Exactly… I was suppose to get my results today.

Damn. Tornado damage to Lexington, Kentucky has delayed them a bit.

20230307_102627
20230307_1026271920×2400 192 KB

1 Like
#64

I got same email here…

1 Like
#65

My target results date has moved from 13th March to 7th April.

1 Like
#66

Yes… really sketchy in my opinion how they are running this . Yes, the lab got hit… , but something more is up. Wait until you get your results.

#67

The status of the entry has also reverted back to the start. It will be interesting to see how people compare on their metrics, but I am not a major fan of the methodologies. I much prefer functional tests (even cosmetics) and biomarkers.

1 Like
#68

I never received the emails you guys received, so I emailed them. They responded back having looked up my details on their system with “it will be with you in 2 days” …. And indeed they did turn up after 2 days.
Might be worth just asking them.

1 Like
#69

They have told me to do another sample.

#70

Just finished - or I should say ended my ZOOM early with Hannah Went of TruDiagnostics. She is kind of an aggressive personality for a front line person. Here is how it went down.

I received several reminders from Hannah of my meeting time and just before. I was ready - early and she finally came on – the meeting started late. Ummm… okay.

The first thing out of Hannah mouth was: Good morning James.
I replied: Good morning! Jason here?!? You are Hannah?? Correct?

Hannah’s response was: Oh? Yeah, I saw that your name had a “J” in it. Sorry.

I thought hmmm… Okay James - close enough for a company that prides itself on trust and accuracy. And, the multiple emails to me as Jason. Whatever.

I took a minute to briefly run down why I think something had to go wrong in that I am chronologically age 65 years and your test says I am 67 biological years… really? I shared my outstanding medical tests DEXA - no fat, Coronary Scan - heart of a person under 35 years, Dental - mouth of a 28 year old… medical observations. Blood panels - off the charts… and hit upon other aging tests taken several times and consistent with TruMe, GlycanAge, Levine. Hannah immediately dismissed all of them. She stated a shot of estrogen could lower all of those my 20 years - all are inferior to their test. I said these tests are created by the best in the anti-aging field and when taken multiple times with the same results - something like an aberition (estrogen shot) is less likely. Hannah then tauted Dr. David SInclair is on their board. You know who he is???

I said yes… so, you can negate all the other tests and even medical tests I guess… but I have been on rapmycin for 2 1/2 years. You don’t think that would make any difference.

Hannah said there are no human trials on rapamycin. I said excuse me – PEARL clincial trial and several others. She said, Oh well none are complete. Rapamycin is unproven… makes no difference.

Ummm… From her own Dr. David Sinclair. He tried it once and got a cold… so he is a bit wary of it… but still says “the science behind it is very strong”.
Link: Rapamycin | Dr David Sinclair Interview Clips - YouTube

I asked do you think something might not be right. Hannah said NO! I figured there was no need for further analysis or discussion. ZOOM - ended by me.

Definitely a waste of time and money in my opinion. Going to stay the course of rapamycin and acarbose, and TRT. I will rely on the facts of my medical tests – improved muscle, heart, mouth, bone, weight control - no visceral fat, improved skin, no arthritis, fixed choking and memory – probably a few more - oh yeah euphoric state of mind. Which is why I will laugh TruDiagnositic off and Hannah. Let the games continue… meh, live and learn.

Just my N=1 on TruDiagnostic. When I am 100 years in good health - will see if David SInclair (and Hannah) is still around. Hahaha.

11 Likes
#71

I do find it interesting that the TruDiagnostics test has such different results than the other tests… I guess we’ll have to wait until the entire field moves forward for a while. I don’t put a lot of weight on these tests right now, just something to follow as they develop. The person you spoke to is likely just a frontline sales/customer support person who knows just enough to be dangerous :smile:

3 Likes
#72

This seems to be a video of the individual (left).

2 Likes
#73

Oh my God. Yes that’s her. I thought she was front line staff… the Founder is calling the users? Must not be very staff deep.

She has a biology degree (B.S.) from the powerhouse University of Kentucky?? Lol and she’s poo -poo-ing PhD’s in anti-aging at Stanford University Yelena Budovskaya, Dr. Levine and Gordon Lauc of GlycanAge.

Linked in: Sign Up | LinkedIn

She was so defensive… now I get it. I wondered why she didn’t move me up to someone with more knowledge… HELL she is it! The top person and receptionist too. Lol.

This is the great researcher…CEO and Founder of TruDiagnostic… with 15,000 users… +1… me! Hahaha.

Tossed my money in the wind on this one.

No wonder she had no reply to medical tests like DEXA, Coronary Calcium Scan, Blood panels, dental exams… etc. Way out of her league.

Thanks for this JuanDaw… hahaha. Jesus!!

This site has people who know how to dig out information.

4 Likes
#74

Also explains my results.
Won’t bother wasting any more money on them.
Thank you Jason for calling them out.

3 Likes
#75

Juan Daw is our Sherlock Holmes. Hannah Went - B.S. and CEO had absolutely no response to actual medical scans, technology and tests. She did have her fool-proof algorithms.

But I concur, done with it.

1 Like
#76

Thats one thing I love about our community… people dig deep and find all sorts of things that I would never had found. We have a great group of people here.

6 Likes
#77

I’ll spend money in Kentucky on May 6 - at the Churchill Downs.

4 Likes
#78

Thanks for the info. This is definitely disturbing and does not inspire confidence in Truediagnostics as a company. Hopefully the test itself is still good even though the staff is not.

I looked into epigenetic tests recently and my conclusion was that the DunedinPACE test is likely to be the best one in terms of being practically useful. This is based on the studies on which the algorithm is trained and the results of that training, including the fact that it has a good intra class correlation. I still think the DunedinPACE is the most valuable epigenetic test on the market for optimizing one’s health. I haven’t bought any epigenetic age tests myself though. It’s not a priority until they become cheap enough to take more often and and more validated.

4 Likes
#79

I am not happy with Trudiagnostic because they were supposed to send me the equipment for retesting and nothing has arrived as yet notwithstanding a payment of GBP50. I am not a fan of epigenetic tests, but thought it might be interesting to see the conclusions from this.

However, Trudiagnostic are discouraging me from recommending their services at the moment.

Edit 1/4/23 it has now arrived

2 Likes
#80

Seems to be a one person show at the home office in Kentucky. CEO, lab worker and Receptionist Hannah Went.

Cannot even get your first name correct and then blows it off.

Definitely get a ditzy sorority vibe from her.

Limited education all charts and graphs… no cross check or double review… that costs money. Appears to be in this for quick cash… not a serious researcher… no credibility.

MHO.

2 Likes