Curious
#3
This is a contrarian idea, to what we have read elsewere.
medaura
#4
So it’s bull, they seem to admit
cl-user
#5
Yes. That study is poorly designed because they applied a linear model while we know for sure that the ketones positive effects follows a U shaped curve. No ketones is not very good but too much ketones is ketoacidosis which is a life-threatening problem in a few hours.
Here is a plot showing how ketones will increase then fall with the progression of liver disease.
Several of the GHRH peptides increase IGF-1, one of the reasons I use them.
Because WADA is always looking for ways to detect use of PED’s, there are a number of excellent studies that demonstrate this.
chris masterjohn recently had a post about sulfur and pyruvate…
Whether the GOT1/GOT2 transamination reaction occurs determines whether the H2S-producing reactions generate serine or pyruvate. Without the action of GOT1 or GOT2, the nitrogen is retained, generating serine alongside H2S via CSE or CBS. With the action of GOT1 or GOT2, as in the generation of H2S via CDO or MPST, pyruvate is produced.
Serine itself can be converted to pyruvate via serine dehydratase (not shown in the diagram).
Thus, producing H2S always has the ability to generate pyruvate, and necessarily produces pyruvate when it occurs via CDO or MPST.
Since pyruvate is a carbohydrate that is primarily derived from glucose during glycolysis, this means two things:
-
Carbohydrate restriction can hasten the generation of H2S by breaking down cysteine to get an alternative source of pyruvate.
-
Carbohydrate intake will tend to suppress H2S generation not only by removing the need to generate pyruvate but also by generating pyruvate and serine, which will collectively back up four H2S-producing reactions by product inhibition.