It was a waste of time article and not sure why she bothered at all. She’s obviously not an A-team reporter. Seeing Bob’s smiling face was the only highlight!

6 Likes

From my email discussions with Dana I got the feeling that the article was going to be a lot more enthusiastic (based on what the users were conveying to her), but I suspect the editors ramped down the positivity of the article.

4 Likes

Never trust a journalist.

14 Likes

My guess would be they were treading lightly/carefully not to sound too optimistic. A picture-perfect article would not have made past the editing board in such a well-known paper. Can’t expect too much the mere mentioning in NYT I thing is pretty BIG.

4 Likes

Thanks for the feedback.

1 Like

Its ok, we don’t have to work ourselves into a blather. Lets focus on making things better and just remember to treat each other as we would like to be treated (assuming you aren’t a masochist :slight_smile: )

15 Likes

I didn’t think your comment was in bad taste, if anything your frustration is shared.

If you are overweight, you are already stacking the odds heavily against you. I’m sure that if Bob is investing in Rapa he’s got his diet, exercise, and sleep all in order else he’s just sprinkling water on an inferno.

The article should have been a case in the science and data.

1 Like

It is always interesting to be involved (or know the real facts) in a major news article or event. You get to see how some of the sausage is made. It really helps you to interpret other news and commentary in the media. What gets included, what doesn’t get included. What picture is chosen, how people react…

There is a lot of filter and “editorial choice” in everything in the media.

9 Likes

It would have improved the article to have more views, particularly from a doctor with experience in the realm.

3 Likes

Exactly.
And again, truly sorry, I was just looking at what I read and saw. I’m not sure how much was actually edited out. My reaction to news.

Pretty sure that we all here because aging sucks, and trying anything we can do to take that away and help others too. It’s a worthy use of time.

And it sucks that some people get a better benefit than others, and we just keep looking for what else can we do.

Bob: Its ok, we don’t have to work ourselves into a blather.

Thanks for being more kind than I.

14 Likes

Just spent about fifteen minutes, reading through the 450 +"comments from the article.

About 90% are negative… nothing I read was positive from self identified doctors.

Now you know why not to bring it up to your doctor and ask for a prescription.

10 Likes

Yes - I did the same. Its disappointing about the public’s level of interest in Longevity. Most people are totally happy with the basics of “eat healthy and exercise”… anything beyond that seems unimaginable to them. Oh well… more rapamycin for us :wink:

7 Likes

Exactly.

And to be honest, I think saying, 90 percent was generous.Closer to 99 percent were negative.

If they came to this website, they’d think we’re all wearing aluminum foil hats. Hahaha :rofl:

7 Likes

If they wanna age and die, let them. As long as money keeps flowing in from pharma, investors and billionaires it doesn’t matter.

2 Likes

Not wanting to seem too cynical about the article’s author Dana - but I contacted her immediately upon it being noted she was looking to interview a few rapamycin users. August 8th.

My email contained before and after pics, charts that demonstarted a reversal in biological age of Glycans and DNA Methylation, coronary calcium scans results, DEXA and more. Was a pretty sold case of rapamycin working incredibly well. I was a bit surprised to receive this reply - knowing I have more test results, images and such over a 4-year period then the average member on here.

Dana Smith dana.smith@nytimes.com|Mon, Aug 12, 9:26 AM me
Hi Jason,
Thanks so much for getting in touch. I’ve been overwhelmed with responses from the group – I really appreciate everyone being so generous with their time and experience! – so I think I’m all set now, but thank you for being willing to share your story.
Best wishes,
Dana

Maybe Dana wasn’t seeking a super positive response to rapamycin? Just thinking…

10 Likes

I read the 450+ comments on the article. Amazing mixture of misinformed, unkind, close-minded, incurious, judgemental, arrogant and ignorant.

I particularly marvelled at the comment where a guy was complaining that the article didn’t explain this fact or that fact, didn’t cite proof and so on, therefore he’ll pass on rapa, not interested.

Unless the article gives him all the information and voluminous evidence to his satisfaction, he will pass - in other words the burden of convincing him to extend his very own health/life is on some random journalist and a short throwaway article in a newspaper.

He didn’t take the article as a starting point to do his own deep dive into a presumably vitally important topic that might affect his very life and health. His attitude wasn’t “well, rapa might be valuable or it might not, let’s see what I can learn”. It wasn’t “gee, thanks for alerting me to this interesting thing that has the potential to be incredibly important for my life, it’s a starting point, now time to roll up my sleeves and educate myself!”.

To riff off of a boringly persistent complaint in those comments : it sounds like people don’t want to do the basic and hard work of studying the issue, they’d just rather a newspaper article tell them everything in one easily popped knowledge pill, even as “everyone knows there are no shortcuts”.

Do no research to inform yourself, instead throw out shopworn cliches, folksy bon mots, “clever” put downs, and vent your ignorance to general applause and groupthink.

What happened to independent thinking, inellectual curiosity, the American can do spirit and thinking before speaking?

11 Likes

@Agetron A form letter. I got the same reply. But you are the poster child for rapa; your before and after photos are amazing. I’m guessing she either had a pre-formed message that she wanted the article to support or she just was too busy to do a thorough job.

5 Likes

Checked the rapa news signed-up user count when article first posted here (four hours ago) - 4315.

Currently 4342

Momentum is building!

5 Likes

Could someone please post The NY Times story link (at the top of this page) into the Reddit Longevity group: https://www.reddit.com/r/longevity/new/

and biohacker group: https://www.reddit.com/r/Biohackers/

I’ve long ago been banned because I posted too much rapamycin information.

4 Likes

NYT’s very raison d’etre is to tell its readers what to think. Ergo, people who like being told what to think over self-select among its readers. Nothing new to look at here, move on. Their reporting exudes smarm and conceit since time immemorial.

8 Likes