I am skeptical about the new options because the old ones work so well, and I was never a big fan of variable focus eyeglasses. I tried them and never felt comfortable with them.
FWIW:
This is intended for anyone contemplating interocular lens transplants.
I underwent the procedure over thirty years ago. I only had mild cloudiness in both eyes. It first manifested itself in reduced night vision while driving.
The choices at the time were distance, near, or one eye’s near vision and the other eye’s distance vision.
My sister chose one eye near vision and the other distance vision option, and somehow, her brain adapted to this, and she didn’t need glasses for anything. I also knew a friend who chose this option and was pleased with the results.
Somehow, this didn’t seem like something I wanted to try. At the time, I was still playing tennis, and I wanted to continue to play without having to use glasses.
I chose the distance vision option to drive and play tennis without glasses.
The result was better than I expected. The whole world seemed brighter, and the colors were much more vivid.
After receiving the new distance lenses, I was surprised that I could still read without glasses, though not as well as I could with reading glasses. Near vision was easily corrected with off-the-shelf reading glasses from my local drugstore.
After thirty-plus years, I have developed some astigmatism that needs to be corrected with prescription glasses. I can still drive without glasses, and I can easily pass the vision test at my DMV without glasses.
My ophthalmologist says I could have my eyes’ astigmatism corrected with LASIK surgery.
So yes, you can get an intraocular lens first and LASIK afterwards if you need further correction.
If you’re older and have the option, I would choose intraocular lens replacement over LASIK.