B & C model descriptions describe each of them as,
…a precision scientific instrument intended for experienced ICES users.
I’d follow that advice.
B & C models support the use of 2 and 3 pairs of coils respectively. If you have multiple sites you want to treat simultaneously, it might make sense.
Alternatively, You could purchase a pair of the A9 models for less money and have greater flexibility in their use. I’ve done this when I borrowed an A9 device I had purchased for my daughter when she had a shoulder injury. Easier to simultaneously have one on your Vagal nerve and one on a twisted ankle.
As I understand it:
-
The different devices don’t actually generate different pulses or different ranges of the intensity of pulses and
-
Higher intensity does not equate to better or more effective treatment, it mainly enables the right level of pulse to affect tissues deeper in the body. Use on a cut would require a lower setting than addressing something in one’s torso. Think of it as use of a higher intensity setting on a cut will focus the pulses beyond where you want them.
The M1 device might make a better “upgrade” choice from the A9 for many. More compact. More controls.
If I had enough extra space, I’d consider a full body PEMF device. They can start at $5,000 and climb rapidly from that point.
Hmmm…" Given it should last 10 years or more, maybe I should make space, but then where does one fit in the equally desired: sensory deprivation tank, infrared sauna, cryo-tank, and hyperbaric chamber? This could require some serious planning.
I’d want a true medical grade one. They exist. Not cheap. You don’t want one that some opportunistic company slapped together without a real understanding of the technology. Maybe get one from a firm that Dr. Robert Dennis (Micro-Pulse founder and PEMF inventor) advises or that licenses the technology. Not certain if the original patents remain in effect.
From the Micro-Pulse site:
The original NASA TVEMF - PEMF systems were developed by Dr. Robert Dennis for NASA under contract in 1997 - 1998. Recently corrected NASA patents verify his status as original inventor.
FYI - I have no commercial relationship with Dennis or Micro-Pulse. I just like the stuff. It works.
*Some additional thoughts on full body PEMF devices. *
It occurs to me that a user would need the ability to adjust intensity of different sections of such a device to address different thicknesses of the body as well as different locations on or within the body one wanted to treat. Note that the Micro-Pulse devices enable one to position coils on opposite sides of an intended treatment area, essentially focusing the pulses from two sides. A serious full body PEMF device might best work as a long tube with many coils that one could focus.