It turns out Energy drinks like Red Bulls and Monsters have been onto something for years.

4 Likes

What is your evidence that mitochondrial inefficiency drives the age-related decline in taurine levels? I dug around and could find no evidence that mitochondria are involved in taurine biosynthesis. It’s certainly important in mitos: it’s needed for a posttranslational modification of mitochondrial tRNAs’ uridines at the anticodon wobble position for proper anticodon–codon interactions to allow ribosomes to synthesize mitochondrial-encoded proteins, and the Yadav paper shows that TAU supplementation restores levels of mitochondrial electron chain complexes. But all that shows mitochondria are impaired by low TAU, not that impaired mito drive low TAU in the first place.

3 Likes

I don’t have any specific evidence on this. Obviously taurine metabolism will require some enzymes to be produced. My hypothesis essentially rests on the failure to produce proteins in either the right quantities or at all (I think it is probabilistic).

It remains, however, that taurine levels will be a secondary effect of some primary cause whether that is the failure to produce specific proteins or something else.

What’s his evidence for this? All the trials I could find reported that taurine supplementation either reduced or had no effect on LDL-C.

2 Likes

The evidence was stated in the video with his references. There may be contradictory evidence from other sources.

Others here may find this interesting:

Reporting on a Nine Month Self-Experiment in Taurine Supplementation

Today’s post is a report from the community on the impact of taurine supplementation on a few biomarkers of interest. Taurine is a dietary amino acid, and circulating levels of taurine influence any number of biological processes. Taurine levels decrease with age in a variety of species; in humans circulating taurine is halved by age 50. You might recall that supplementation with taurine was demonstrated to modestly extend life in mice and improve health in old non-human primates. This may be largely due to enhanced performance of the antioxidant glutathione, and you might recall that other approaches to upregulation of glutathione activity have been shown to produce benefits in old humans, dampening oxidative stress and associated inflammation.

A few human clinical trials of taurine supplementation have been conducted, but the results are not all that conclusive, other than to demonstrate that this form of intervention is very safe. So why not give it a try, and see what results? If you look back in the Fight Aging! archives, you’ll find an outline for a self-experiment with taurine supplementation. Taurine is cheap and readily available as as a supplement, and inexpensive blood tests can be used to assess outcomes. Here, the self-experimenter chose to focus on phenotypic age and the biomarkers used to construct this assessment of phenotypic age. Only one marker of oxidative stress was used, an assessment of circulating oxidized LDL particles.

  • The self-experimenter was a vegetarian in his 50s.

  • 3 grams per day of taurine was taken orally for 9 months.

  • Diet and lifestyle was kept consistent, as much as possible in a busy life.

  • Phenotypic age acceleration: -9.00 to -10.85 years

  • Albumin: 4.1 to 4.3 g/dL (reference range is 3.6-5.1 g/dL)

  • Creatine: 0.72 to 0.65 mg/dL (desired range is 0.70-1.30 mg/dL)

  • Fasting Glucose: 93 to 90 mg/dL (desired range: 65-99 mg/dL)

  • C-Reactive Protein: 0.30 to 0.34 mg/L (considered low risk under 1.00 mg/L)

  • Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) 53 to 50 U/L (reference range is 35-144 U/L)

  • Lymphocyte Percentage 33.1% to 40.7% (normal range is 20% to 40%)

  • Mean Cell Volume (MCV): 87.8 to 88.6 fL (desired range is 80.0-100.0 fL)

  • Red Cell Dist Width (RDW): 13.3% to 13.5% (desired range is 11.0-15.0%)

  • White Blood Cells (WBC): 4.8 to 3.9 Thousand/uL (reference range is 3.8-10.8 Thousand/uL)

  • Taurine: 43.6 to 114.9 umol/L (reference range is 29.2-132.3 umol/L)

  • Oxidized LDL: 105 to 82 ng/mL (reference range is 10-170 ng/mL)

  • LDL and HDL cholesterol levels were largely unchanged.

  • Absolute Lymphocytes: 1589 to 1587 cells/uL (desired range is 850-3900 cells/uL)

  • Absolute Monocytes: 312 to 269 cells/uL (desired range is 200-950 cells/uL)

  • Absolute Neutrophils: 2832 to 1981 cells/uL (desired range is 1500-7800 cells/uL)

  • Lymphocyte: Monocyte Ratio: 5.1 to 5.9

  • Other complete blood count statistics were largely unchanged.

Going from the data provided, the supplementation successfully increased a low circulating taurine level to a high circulating taurine level as intended, and modestly reduced phenotypic age. The most interesting change seen in the biomarkers making up the phenotypic age metric is the increased lymphocyte percentage. This change was entirely due to the absolute neutrophil count decreasing from 2832 to 1981 cells/uL, while other absolute counts for white blood cell types remained much the same. Neutrophil counts can be raised temporarily by transient infection or inflammation, but per the self-experimenter, ~2800 had been a fairly consistent level for absolute neutrophil count for some years prior to this self-experiment. The observed reduction is thus a novel change, and likely due to the taurine supplementation.

A second interesting point is the reduction in oxidized LDL, a marker of oxidative stress and also a contributing factor in the development of atherosclerosis. As a sidebar, also note the low creatine levels, characteristic of vegetarians since dietary creatine is mostly found in meat.

The modestly favorable results shown here form only a single data point and should be taken as an anecdote, of course. It would be interesting to see the results of a few hundred participant clinical trial of taurine supplementation that focused on the various modern approaches to measuring biological age, such as epigenetic clocks. One shouldn’t expect there to be a rush to do this, however. Trials are expensive, and there is little spare funding to be found in the business of selling well-established supplement compounds. At the end of the day modest effect sizes are modest effect sizes, and we’d like to focus on better approaches to the problem of aging - but if the intervention is both very cheap and very safe, then it may well be worth the effort to further establish the degree to which it can be useful.

13 Likes

All the more reason to supplement Taurine. Based on this N=1 analysis, I’d say the experiment is a success for this individual. It also shows how effective 3 g daily is. I’ll still strive for 4-5 g daily intake.

I would like to note that the biggest reason I take Taurine is it’s abilities as a senomorphic. Unfortunately, this data point did not test senescent cell load.

5 Likes
3 Likes

I have used taurine in powder form from Now Foods and been happy with that. But recently I have tried two European brands and found that they taste a little bit different. I am now considering buying from, Bulksupplements.com or Bulk.com.

I wonder if you have any opinion of those two brands? They sell Taurine at much less than half the price of NOW foods Taurine in powder form.

1 Like

Anyone have a good view on how good of a measure this is for oxidative stress?

According to ConsumerLab.com, Bulk supplements is a top pick for amino acids like Taurine and for Astaxanthin.

7 Likes

I think you’re overextrapolating. CL did make Bulk supplements their top pick for taurine, but they didn’t give them an overall top pick for aminos. BS fails CL testing more often than they pass, as for quercetin, ginkgo, rutin, and just last week their magnesium. CL didn’t test BS’ astaxanthin themselves: they summarized a report issued by NOW Foods that said that BS’ asta was one of the few products that passed their testing.

2 Likes

I see that some brands now market “tasteless taurine”. The taurine I am used to, have a distinct mouthfeel when you take a teaspoon of T in your mouth. I wonder what is changed, since that mouthfeel now is eliminated?

2 Likes

Yes Bulk Supplements have failed testing on some of their polyphenols. Like everything else you do need to do your own research.

I trust NOW foods and their testing. I still trust Bulk supplements for their taurine, citrulline, Astaxanthin and amino acids. CL also rated Bulk Supplements as their top pick for the amino acid L-citrulline.

I disagree with the statement that Bulk Supplements fails more often than not. But I would say that you have to be aware of what you buy from them unlike NOW where you can assume everything is high quality.

3 Likes

NOW is my favorite supplement brand. I have never seen a product test bad and their prices are reasonable.

7 Likes

From last month: Taurine reduces the risk for metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Our analysis included 1024 participants from 25 RCTs. The daily dosage of taurine in the studies ranged from 0.5 g/day to 6 g/day, with follow-up periods varying between 5 and 365 days. Compared to control groups, taurine supplementation demonstrated statistically significant reductions in SBP (weighted mean difference [WMD] = −3.999 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −7.293 to −0.706, p = 0.017), DBP (WMD = −1.509 mmHg, 95% CI = −2.479 to −0.539, p = 0.002), FBG (WMD: −5.882 mg/dL, 95% CI: −10.747 to −1.018, p = 0.018), TG (WMD: −18.315 mg/dL, 95% CI: −25.628 to −11.002, p < 0.001), but not in HDL-C (WMD: 0.644 mg/dl, 95% CI: −0.244 to 1.532, p = 0.155). Meta-regression analysis revealed a dose-dependent reduction in DBP (coefficient = −0.0108 mmHg per g, p = 0.0297) and FBG (coefficient = −0.0445 mg/dL per g, p = 0.0273). No significant adverse effects were observed compared to the control group.
a similar statistically significant effect was observed for LDL-C levels (WMD: −6.495 mg/dL, 95% CI: −10.912 to −2.079, p = 0.004)

8 Likes

Has anyone read this article?

Might not be the best source, but refers to science.

What’s the scientific opinion?

This study is clickbait and IMHO rubbish. Studies have already shown that increased dietary sugar intake is associated with higher colon cancer levels. (See below)

One Red Bull a day is 63 g (127% RDA) of sugar daily!!! They’re going to have each participant drink one Red Bull a day.

Also, Red Bull is a mixture of a ton of different ingredients. Any results obtained could come from any of the ingredients, but probably the sugar.

This study is as valuable as a study to see if smoking causes lung cancer by having you smoke asbestos-laced cigs while living in a room full of Radon next to an unshielded nuclear reactor.

10 Likes

Interesting ongoing Brazilian trial: Taurine Effect on Glycemic, Lipidic and Inflammatory Profile in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes (TAUGLIP-DM2)

94 participants, HbA1c between 7.5% and 10.5%. “Participants will receive 3 g taurine, twice a day, as a powder for oral suspension (3 g/packet) for 12 weeks. Participants will be recommended to take the taurine immediately before the breakfast and dinner.” They’ll measure: HbA1c, fasting glucose, insulin, total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, TG, glucose variability (with CGM), TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, urine creatinine, albuminuria, and BMI. Results next year.

8 Likes

Makes sense to wait till next year. Will stop taking taurine on a daily basis till there’s more data available.

1 Like