Cheap drug given once a decade slashes risk of bone fractures in older women, ‘astonishing’ Kiwi trial discovers

This article is behind a paywall. Here’s the main body… Pretty impressive results. I certainly intend to speak with my Doctor about this!

A ground-breaking New Zealand trial has discovered a cheap treatment given only once every five to 10 years can prevent devastating bone fractures in women who have gone through menopause.

The results from the University of Auckland researchers have been published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the world’s most prestigious medical journal, which has highlighted their importance in an editorial.

Oestrogen levels drop after menopause and this weakens bone density, which can result in painful fractures that lead to disability or even death. About half of women suffer a fracture after they reach menopause.

Currently, only people who are at high risk of fracture - due to combinations of old age, lots of falls, low bone density or previous breaks - are offered one of a variety of medicines that can improve bone density.

However, about 80% of fractures happen to women who are considered at low or intermediate risk. The injuries are often the first sign of a problem.

The 10-year trial led by Mark Bolland, an associate professor at the University of Auckland’s School of Medicine, tested a hypothesis - could treatment instead start much earlier - when many women are in their 50s - and prevent age-related bone density loss and the risk of fracture?

A generic drug, Zoledronate, was used. This is a proven bisphosphonate medicine that is currently given to people with osteoporosis (when bones become weak and brittle) as an infusion annually or every 18 months, to slow down the cells that break down bone.

Bolland and other researchers wanted to know if very infrequent infusions of the drug - once every five or 10 years - would also prevent fractures and maintain bone mineral density in early postmenopausal women, who were not considered high risk.

Women from 50 to 60 years of age were randomly selected from the Auckland electoral roll and invited to participate in the novel study.

The more than 1000 participants were split into three groups: those who received a 5mg zoledronate infusion at the beginning of the study and again after five years, those who received only one infusion at the start, and a placebo group.

After 10 years, the results showed that both a single infusion of zoledronate and an infusion every five years reduced the risk of vertebral (spinal) fractures by about 41-44%, and all fractures by about 23-30%.

Put another way, if 22 women were treated with a single infusion then after 10 years that would prevent one woman having a vertebral fracture.

“No one has given zoledronate so infrequently before, and I suspect many people will find the results astonishing, because there are very few examples of a medicine having effects that last so long,” Bolland said.

“It really does open, for the first time, the idea that perhaps a 50-something woman could have several infusions in her remaining life, keep her bone density close to the level it was when she started treatment, and dramatically reduce her risk of fracture as she ages.

“The results show that for the first 10 years this approach is effective (and more effective than we could have hoped for) and leaves us optimistic that the benefits of five or 10-yearly zoledronate will continue after that. We are doing an extension study to test this.”

Participants in the trial, which was funded by the Health Research Council, will now be monitored for a further 10 years to test this. The extension will also delve further into what difference receiving an infusion every five or 10 years makes. That currently appears to be marginal, Bolland told the Herald.

“The simplest way of saying it is that five-yearly infusions might be a bit better than 10-yearly, but it’s a ‘might’.”

Zoledronate was chosen after previous research by Bolland and others found its effect on bone health lasted at least five years - much longer than the drug company’s initial recommendation of annual treatment.

The cost of a zoledronate infusion, which can be done at general practices, is about $20 for the drug itself, and anywhere from free to about $150 for administration.

The research focused on women, who, because of menopause, lose bone density about 10-15 years earlier than men.

“But I think there’s no reason to think it wouldn’t work in men. Zoledronate prevents fractures in older men,” Bolland said.

It would take the medical community time to digest the findings, he said.

“I don’t think we should insist that people have treatment. But I think the guidelines should change, and they should say that this is an option for people who are not at high risk but are concerned about having fractures in the future.”

Zoledronate is generally safe, Bolland said, but about one in five people get a flu-like illness for around 24-48 hours after the first dose. His team are doing other studies examining if taking a steroid can eliminate this.

In its editorial on the “important” findings, the New England Journal of Medicinenoted that, “patients who are candidates for these strategies may be at low risk individually, but if the strategies are implemented in a large proportion of the population, the number of events that can be avoided - such as fractures - can be large…a very infrequent drug regimen presents a real opportunity”.

Other study authors included Zaynah Nisa, Anna Mellar, Chiara Gasteiger, Veronica Pinel, Borislav Mihov, Sonja Bastin, Andrew Grey, Ian Reid, Greg Gamble and Anne Horne.

14 Likes

Source Paper (Paywalled):

Fracture Prevention with Infrequent Zoledronate in Women 50 to 60 Years of Age

CONCLUSIONS

Ten years after trial initiation, zoledronate administered at baseline and 5 years was effective in preventing morphometric vertebral fracture in early postmenopausal women. (Funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12612000270819.)

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2407031

related

Women in early menopause treated with zoledronate in just two infusions, 5 years apart, show a significantly reduced risk of sustaining a vertebral fracture and better maintenance of bone mineral density (BMD) over a 10-year period than those receiving just one or no infusions over the period, suggesting the infrequent, early dosing to be a beneficial preventive fracture risk strategy.

“The results show that prevention of vertebral fractures in early postmenopausal women is possible with very infrequent infusions of zoledronate,” the authors wrote in the study, published online on January 15 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The infrequent zoledronate regimen “is worth discussing with patients, as some may be interested in this approach to primary fracture prevention when they are at low or intermediate risk of fracture, rather than waiting until they are at high risk of fracture before offering treatment,” first author Mark J. Bolland, MB, PhD, of the Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, told Medscape Medical News.

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/infrequent-zoledronate-dosing-early-menopause-prevents-later-2025a100011w

8 Likes

Somewhat surprised by the lack of engagement on this. Many of us are rucking, weight training & supplementing to maintain bone density and reduce the risk of fractures when we age…

This study shows that a simple, safe, once-a-decade treatment will achieve much of what we’re aiming for.

Personally, I intend to do both - continue training (it provides many other benefits!) and also investigate being treated with Zoledronate once a decade…

7 Likes

Agree. This is huge. Hopefully it gets repeated and validated, but don’t want to wait that long. Fortunately it was published in major journal and should get noticed.

2 Likes

Fracture Prevention with Infrequent Zoledronate in Women 50 to 60 Years of Age

Why do they get away with this? The number of fractures were ostensibly reduced. Prevention implies elimination.

Results

Of 1054 women with a mean age of 56.0 years at baseline, 1003 (95.2%) completed 10 years of follow-up. A new morphometric fracture occurred in 22 women (6.3%) in the zoledronate–zoledronate group, in 23 women (6.6%) in the zoledronate–placebo group, and in 39 women (11.1%) in the placebo–placebo group (relative risk, zoledronate–zoledronate vs. placebo–placebo, 0.56 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.34 to 0.92; P=0.04]; and zoledronate–placebo vs. placebo–placebo, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.97; P=0.08]). The relative risk of fragility fracture, any fracture, and major osteoporotic fracture was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.93), 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.88), and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.86), respectively, when zoledronate–zoledronate was compared with placebo–placebo and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.61 to 1.02), 0.77 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97), and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.99), respectively, when zoledronate–placebo was compared with placebo–placebo.

I got a Reclast drip last August. I was told my co-pay would be $160, but wasn’t charged anything (Kaiser Medicare Advantage)

I took alendronate for a few years, but a once a year Reclast shot vs. weekly pill (first thing in the morning, no eating for up to two hours) slightly more appealing. Plus if there are cations (calcium, magnesium, iron, etc) in the water you use to ingest the pill, already poor absorption is reduced by 50%+.

If you get the infusion, be sure to be well hydrated, and also, also plan to increase calcium intake (on the order of 750mg calcium daily) for a few days. I got leg cramps the first couple of days anyway.

3 Likes

See this previous thread & posts as well:

2 Likes

If you take these bisphosphonates, you’d better have perfect teeth. There are serious potential complications if you ever have a tooth removed, and forget about implants. The jaws react very differently than hip and vertebral bones. If you’ve already taken them, then be sure to watch your oral health very closely, and see a dentist regularly. Prolia is an effective fracture prevention med that dentists can work around as it lasts only a few months.

3 Likes

I am on the osteoporosis group on Inspire forum. Many have had side effects from drugs and quite a few have had good results (shown evidence) with strontium citrate. Though I am there to learn and have not tried it (worried about possible side effects ).

Johnhighsmith, you have an important point. My limited investigation of bisphosphonates (Fosamax, etc.) years ago with their inhibition of osteoclasts and the potential problems with that made me decide not to take them. The possibility of osteonecrosis of the jaw, though rare, really got my attention. As long as I can move and maintain a healthy diet I’ll try to maintain body and bone health with exercise instead of drugs. However, having had a wheelchair-bound neighbor with easily fractured bones from inactivity I see the need for someone with limited mobility.

Hi yes this article came up on my OP forum but its very rare. On my forum people have been using for many years and seen excellent DEXA confirmed results. Some have gone from OP to osteopenia. It does compete with calcium so most take it at night. However even though I bought it I have not taken it (I worry more about potential clotting risks tbh). This was the only adverse account I have found in the literature on it. So maybe just unlucky. On the other hand, strontium ranelate known for adverse effects. I dont have a diagnosis of OP but being very small boned and petite I know its a risk factor. I get a fastic metabolic bone study test done very year to see if am losing bone.